On FediForum (and not just FediForum)
-
On FediForum (and not just FediForum)
https://privacy.thenexus.today/not-just-fediforum/
A deep dive into @FediForum's last-minute cancellation and the potential opportunity going forward for a collective learning experience, catalyst for change, and perhaps an inflection point -- for FediForum and the broader ecosystem.
-
On FediForum (and not just FediForum)
https://privacy.thenexus.today/not-just-fediforum/
A deep dive into @FediForum's last-minute cancellation and the potential opportunity going forward for a collective learning experience, catalyst for change, and perhaps an inflection point -- for FediForum and the broader ecosystem.
On FediForum (and not just FediForum)
This article discusses ways FediForum and others can make progress and take advantage of these opportunities.
The overall framework I'm using is the "Four A's" (acknowledgment, apology, amends, action), which I first saw in Teh Portly Dyke's 2007 post How to Fuck Up. As well as applying the Four As to three specific items mentioned under "Issues of representation and inclusion" in the FediForum draft summary notes, I relate this to broader challenges – and potential learning – in the broader ecosystems. In an appendix, I also discuss challenges – and potential learning – in the broader ecosystems. See the attached table of contents.
It's very challenging to write about intersecting oppressions without stepping into any minefields, and it can also be hard to write about institutional problems without unintentionally making it seem like I'm criticizing individuals. So apologies in advance for any mistakes I've made, feedback welcome!
-
T thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
On FediForum (and not just FediForum)
https://privacy.thenexus.today/not-just-fediforum/
A deep dive into @FediForum's last-minute cancellation and the potential opportunity going forward for a collective learning experience, catalyst for change, and perhaps an inflection point -- for FediForum and the broader ecosystem.
@thenexusofprivacy @jdp23 Would love for folks who went to #RightsCon to join the discussion. The conjecture about our panel is absolutely false on both counts: Meta was directly challenged and queer, specifically trans, community building on the fediverse was raised. Bringing that panel together at the biggest annual human rights event goes in the plus column, obviously.
-
@thenexusofprivacy @jdp23 Would love for folks who went to #RightsCon to join the discussion. The conjecture about our panel is absolutely false on both counts: Meta was directly challenged and queer, specifically trans, community building on the fediverse was raised. Bringing that panel together at the biggest annual human rights event goes in the plus column, obviously.
Thanks! I'll update the post accordingly.
I asked somebody who was there, and they said that while Meta's presence on the panel was challenged, the FediPact wasn't mentioned, let alone the trans-driven nature of the FediPact (and broader trans resistance to Meta's existence in the Fediverse). Or did they just miss it?
-
Thanks! I'll update the post accordingly.
I asked somebody who was there, and they said that while Meta's presence on the panel was challenged, the FediPact wasn't mentioned, let alone the trans-driven nature of the FediPact (and broader trans resistance to Meta's existence in the Fediverse). Or did they just miss it?
-
Thanks! I'll update the post accordingly.
I asked somebody who was there, and they said that while Meta's presence on the panel was challenged, the FediPact wasn't mentioned, let alone the trans-driven nature of the FediPact (and broader trans resistance to Meta's existence in the Fediverse). Or did they just miss it?
@thenexusofprivacy @jdp23 fedipact was not mentioned. Queer and trans issues broadly underpinning the outline of your post were.
My first question was to each panelist to describe the weakness of their platform. Meta was asked this question. They identified governance as well as other shortcomings.
I don’t pull punches as a moderator. I also don’t intentionally create drama by disrespecting people I invite to a live, platformed conversation.
-
@thenexusofprivacy @jdp23 fedipact was not mentioned. Queer and trans issues broadly underpinning the outline of your post were.
My first question was to each panelist to describe the weakness of their platform. Meta was asked this question. They identified governance as well as other shortcomings.
I don’t pull punches as a moderator. I also don’t intentionally create drama by disrespecting people I invite to a live, platformed conversation.
-
On FediForum (and not just FediForum)
This article discusses ways FediForum and others can make progress and take advantage of these opportunities.
The overall framework I'm using is the "Four A's" (acknowledgment, apology, amends, action), which I first saw in Teh Portly Dyke's 2007 post How to Fuck Up. As well as applying the Four As to three specific items mentioned under "Issues of representation and inclusion" in the FediForum draft summary notes, I relate this to broader challenges – and potential learning – in the broader ecosystems. In an appendix, I also discuss challenges – and potential learning – in the broader ecosystems. See the attached table of contents.
It's very challenging to write about intersecting oppressions without stepping into any minefields, and it can also be hard to write about institutional problems without unintentionally making it seem like I'm criticizing individuals. So apologies in advance for any mistakes I've made, feedback welcome!
@fediforum I've updated https://privacy.thenexus.today/not-just-fediforum/ to include a brief discussion of the second listening session. Is this snippet accurate? And, do you have a timeframe for the notes?
-
@fediforum I've updated https://privacy.thenexus.today/not-just-fediforum/ to include a brief discussion of the second listening session. Is this snippet accurate? And, do you have a timeframe for the notes?
-
@thenexusofprivacy Next couple days.
@fediforum thanks!
