Skip to content
  • Categories
  • World
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

The Nexus of Discussions

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Uncategorized
  4. Dear @creativecommons ,

Dear @creativecommons ,

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
3 Posts 3 Posters 6 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
    davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
    davidrevoy@framapiaf.org
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Dear @creativecommons ,

    I read your article about your initiative for new licenses for dataset holders in the AI industry.

    Let’s be clear: I do not want to re-license my hundreds of CC-By comic pages to please AI giants.

    I wish you would support CC artists suffering from massive plagiarism. You should enforce your own existing licenses against AI mass crawling. It seems you’ve joined the battle only after the casualties and still managed to side with the wrong people.

    https://creativecommons.org/2025/06/25/introducing-cc-signals-a-new-social-contract-for-the-age-of-ai/

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD davidrevoy@framapiaf.org

      Dear @creativecommons ,

      I read your article about your initiative for new licenses for dataset holders in the AI industry.

      Let’s be clear: I do not want to re-license my hundreds of CC-By comic pages to please AI giants.

      I wish you would support CC artists suffering from massive plagiarism. You should enforce your own existing licenses against AI mass crawling. It seems you’ve joined the battle only after the casualties and still managed to side with the wrong people.

      https://creativecommons.org/2025/06/25/introducing-cc-signals-a-new-social-contract-for-the-age-of-ai/

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @davidrevoy @creativecommons from the 4 proposed signals (credit, direct contribution, ecosystem contribution and open), none of them is about forbidding the usage of the assets to train AI😬

      https://creativecommons.org/ai-and-the-commons/cc-signals/implementation/

      thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchangeT 1 Reply Last reply
      • ? Guest

        @davidrevoy @creativecommons from the 4 proposed signals (credit, direct contribution, ecosystem contribution and open), none of them is about forbidding the usage of the assets to train AI😬

        https://creativecommons.org/ai-and-the-commons/cc-signals/implementation/

        thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
        thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
        thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Yep. I have a rant about that (and a link to the github issue pointing that out) in https://infosec.exchange/@thenexusofprivacy/114747556378384004

        @davidrevoy @carl

        1 Reply Last reply
        • thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchangeT thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange shared this topic
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        Please keep the community guidelines in mind!
        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • World
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups